Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6490 14
Original file (NR6490 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
TH sear . ear.
ZF PT a Sai

ROE BOARD FOR CO

be “Soe eer

4
i ji, yee & COURTHOUSE RES

ARLINGTON VA 22204-2480

 

BAN
Docket No:NRO6490-14
7 November 2014 ,

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

Tol: Secretary of the Navy

Sub}: ee
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Enel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments

(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 5400 PERS-806 of
27 Oct 2014

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the-
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner's
Date of Rank to CWO3 be corrected to show a date of 1 October
2013 vice 1 November 2013, now of record. ©

2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Fxnicios, Ms. McCain and Ms.
Aldrich reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 5 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
‘that the corrective action indicated below shoulda be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3, The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

». In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action,
Docket No: NROG490-14

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following

corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION :

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
ag follows:
“s i)

3. Petitioner’s Date of Rank to CWO3 be changed from 1
November 2013 to 1 October 20123.

b. Petitioner is entitled to all back pay and allowances
due to the aforementioned correction.

c, Petitioner’s CWO3 lineal number will be adjusted
accordingly.

d. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the

Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6{c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the

foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matt

 

Be Pursuant to the délegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of

Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the

authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

15 October 2014

ROBERT J. O’ NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2445 14

    Original file (NR2445 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval recora be corrected to show that Petitioner was scrolled approved for an officer appointment as a CWO3 with a Date of Rank of 1 October 2013 vice 1 November 2013. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2914 14

    Original file (NR2914 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was scrolled approved for an officer appointment as a CWO3 with a Date of Rank of 1 November 2013 vice 1 December 2013. ‘The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 May 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2468 14

    Original file (NR2468 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was scrolled approved for an officer appointment as a CWO3 with a Date of Rank of 1 November 2013 vice 1 December 2013. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2933 14

    Original file (NR2933 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was scrolled approved for an officer appointment as a CWO3 with a Date of Rank of 1 November 2013 vice 1 December 2013. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 May 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02007-06

    Original file (02007-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of chief warrant officer 3 (CWO3) he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2004 CWO3 Selection Board, vice the FY 2006 CWO3 Selection Board. They specifically...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02255-10

    Original file (02255-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), counsel for Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of Chief Warrant Officer 3 (CWO3) Petitioner would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 cwo3 Selection Board, rather than the FY 2010 CWO3 Selection...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03811-10

    Original file (03811-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JSR Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), counsel for Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of Chief Warrant Officer 3 (CWO3) Petitioner would have been assigned had he been selected for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05501-09

    Original file (05501-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his retirement on 1 November 2008 was in the grade of Chief Warrant Office 4 (CWO4), rather than CWO3, as he was promoted to CWO4 effective 1 October 2008. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Delorier, Pfeiffer and Rothlein, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 6...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08569-09

    Original file (08569-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    By enclosure (2), he amended his application, as it relates to the report for 1 May 2007 to 30 April 2008, to request that the report be modified, by removing section K (reviewing officer's marks and comments), rather than completely removed. The Board, consisting of Ms. LeBlanc and Messrs. Fales and Grover, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05747-10

    Original file (05747-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 11 October 2006 to 18 April 2007 (copy at Tab A). In enclosure (3), Petitioner also requested removing his failures of selection to chief warrant officer 3 (CWO3) by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 and 2010 CWO3 Selection Boards. Pursuant to the delegation...